[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP8545CC78756DA73CE52730FD140@phx.gbl>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:49:20 +0100
From: Frank Dittrich <frank_dittrich@...mail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: PDF format incompatibility (jumbo-7 vs. jumbo-8)
On 01/24/2013 04:30 PM, Dhiru Kholia wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Frank Dittrich
> <frank_dittrich@...mail.com> wrote:
>> On 01/24/2013 03:27 PM, Dhiru Kholia wrote:
>>> A simple (but probably unpopular) fix is to reject old-style hashes.
>>
>> I am sure Solar wouldn't call breaking backwards compatibility a fix.
>
> I was not careful enough to maintain backwards compatibility when I
> wrote the new pdf format.
OK, but the "$pdf$Standard*" hash should contain all the information
required to construct the hash format which is expected by the jumbo-8
valid(), no?
If all information is there, it should be possible to write a prepare()
function which converts the old-style hash into the new one.
Frank
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
