[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANO7a6yuYTcSM1ctnkYOCaTnhraRbAFt8SyHJH4K8=LTdnO_FQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 10:06:19 +0530
From: Dhiru Kholia <dhiru.kholia@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: clang build error
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Frank Dittrich
<frank_dittrich@...mail.com> wrote:
> clang 3.1 claims to be compatible to gcc 4.2.1 (didn't change since
> clang 2.9).
>
> What does clang 3.2 claim? May be Dhiru can answer this.
>
> clang -dumpversion
> or
> ./john --list=build-info
$ clang --version
clang version 3.2 (tags/RELEASE_32/final)
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
$ clang -dumpversion
4.2.1
$ ../run/john --list=build-info
Version: 1.7.9-jumbo-8-unstable
Build: linux-x86-64-clang
Arch: 64-bit LE
$JOHN is ../run/
Format interface version: 9
Rec file version: REC3
Charset file version: CHR2
CHARSET_MIN: 32 (0x20)
CHARSET_MAX: 126 (0x7e)
CHARSET_LENGTH: 8
Max. Markov mode level: 400
Max. Markov mode password length: 30
Compiler version: 4.2.1 Compatible Clang 3.2 (tags/RELEASE_32/final)
gcc version: 4.2.1
clang version: 3.2 (tags/RELEASE_32/final)
OpenSSL library version: 1000103f
--
Dhiru
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
