[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP150E57686E75FD225BC0DFAFD130@phx.gbl>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 15:22:54 +0100
From: Frank Dittrich <frank_dittrich@...mail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: NSS not needed
On 01/17/2013 01:22 PM, magnum wrote:
> On 16 Jan, 2013, at 4:14 , Dhiru Kholia <dhiru.kholia@...il.com> wrote:
>> Yes, the format can be built without NSS.
>>
>> I suspected this earlier and now you have confirmed it.
>>
>> I will take a look at it soon. Thanks Frank.
>
> This would be nice for Jumbo-8, please commit to unstable if you fix it. Remove all references to HAVE_NSS in Makefile too.
Before we finally get rid of HAVE_NSS, we would need to make sure the
format works for different architectures (e.g., we don't have endianness
or other issues).
May be even a performance comparison is necessary. We might still allow
users to optionally build the format with NSS.
But if NSS is not required, doc/README.mozilla needs to be updated as well.
Frank
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
