|
Message-ID: <6ecc1619cf374b3c02d31db9021f4147@smtp.hushmail.com> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 22:40:34 +0100 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: --list=<conf section name> (was: --list= handling moved out of john.c) On 15 Jan, 2013, at 22:27 , Frank Dittrich <frank_dittrich@...mail.com> wrote: > On 01/15/2013 09:18 PM, magnum wrote: >> On 15 Jan, 2013, at 20:56 , magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> wrote: >> $ ../run/john --list=options >> Subsections of [options]: >> opencl >> mpi >> >> $ ../run/john --list=options:opencl >> Section [options:opencl] not found. >> help[:WHAT], subformats, inc-modes, rules, externals, ext-filters, >> ext-filters-only, ext-modes, build-info, hidden-options, encodings, >> formats, format-details, format-all-details, format-methods[:WHICH], >> sections, parameters:SECTION, list-data:SECTION, >> <conf section name> >> >> The latter is a bug, no? Or how was this supposed to work? > > IMHO, it is just a confusing error message. > --list=<conf section name> should list the subsections of that section. > There are no Subsections which could be listed for [Options:OpenCL] > > A real inconsistency is: > > $ ./john --list=parameters: > incremental:all incremental:all7 incremental:alpha > incremental:lanman options:mpi > incremental:all15 incremental:all8 incremental:digits > markov:default userclasses > incremental:all6 incremental:alnum incremental:digits8 options > > or > > $ ./john --list=parameters:options > options options:mpi > > options:opencl is not listed as a possible completion, because > [Options:OpenCL] is empty (doesn't contain any parameter definitions). > > That's why I think fixing the error message text for the > [Options:MPI] section might be easy. For [Options:OpenCL] it will be a > little bit harder (but not impossible). > > How important is a fix here? Not important. I was just afraid something was b0rken that worked before. > Would another message, e.g., "[options:mpi] doesn't have subsections" be OK? Fine. I guess we should have things like Johnny first in mind. How would it handle the current error? Is the error written to stderr but other things to stdout? > Can we have sections like [Section:Sub:SubSub] at all? I don't think so. > Another bug might be this one: > (unstable-jumbo)run $ ./john --list=parameters:options:mpi > mpiompverbose = Y > mpiompmutex = Y > (unstable-jumbo)run $ echo $? > 0 > (unstable-jumbo)run $ ./john --list=parameters:options:opencl > (unstable-jumbo)run $ echo $? > 0 > > May be $? should be != 0 here. > Or may be it should be 0 here, because [Options:OpenCL] exists, but it > should be != 0 here (section doesn't exist): > (unstable-jumbo)run $ ./john --list=parameters:options:none > (unstable-jumbo)run $ echo $? > 0 > or here (Section contains list data): > (unstable-jumbo)run $ ./john --list=parameters:list.rules:single > (unstable-jumbo)run $ echo $? > 0 Ah yes, this is relevant for things like Johnny. I'm not sure how a developer of things using this "interface" would want it, but I assume some of those cases should return non-zero. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.