[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5878fd88b58150bb798121f693da6343@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 16:33:08 +0100
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Changes to common-opencl.c
On 13 Jan, 2013, at 16:29 , Claudio André <claudioandre.br@...il.com> wrote:
> Em 13-01-2013 07:42, magnum escreveu:
>> On 13 Jan, 2013, at 7:15 , Sayantan Datta <std2048@...il.com> wrote:
>>> 2. Please start numbering devices form 0, not 1 to avoid confusion. i.e --devices =0 ,1,2....
>> I could agree but for what it's worth I believe Hashcat starts from 1. It will be less confusing if we end up with the same device numbers. This is not a big deal for me at all though, most people will not need to use numbers at all.
>>
>> magnum
>
> Everything is 'pure C' zero based now. If this is the case, please say so prior to --devices implementation.
Let's just keep it zero-based. We'll probably not end up with the exact same numbers as Hashcat anyway - it does not count CPU devices.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
