|
Message-ID: <5c253790a1f195c8f7181e93daae86cf@smtp.hushmail.com> Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 15:20:12 +0100 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: SIGALRM and new 'done' method On 12 Jan, 2013, at 15:15 , Claudio André <claudioandre.br@...il.com> wrote: > Em 12-01-2013 11:56, magnum escreveu: >> On 12 Jan, 2013, at 14:55 , magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> wrote: >>> I could reproduce the initial SIGALRM problem we had before 3040fc9 by forcing OS_TIMER=0 in arch.h but I can't reproduce this one. And I really can't see how 4a7c6df could fail to resolve the issue. >>> >>> Does this only ever happen when testing several (ie. all) formats? If so, that is likely a clue. >> Oh and BTW, are you using --test=0 or just --test, or something else? >> >> magnum >> > make *-opencl > ../run/john -t Try -t=0, it's a LOT faster but you don't get proper speed results (at least not for CPU formats). > Only see it when testing several (ie. all) formats. > > Hey, it is OSS. > - git clone git@...hub.com:claudioandre/JohnTheRipper.git > > master branch. I already did :) But like I said, I can't reproduce it on OSX. It's signal() function remains installed after a signal has been delivered. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.