john-dev - Re: SIGALRM and new 'done' method

Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <50F0B266.6000601@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 22:46:30 -0200
From: Claudio André <claudioandre.br@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: SIGALRM and new 'done' method

I had problems using both. Even the third option below fails (seems it 
can works sometimes, but not always).


- common-opencl.c
void opencl_process_event(void)
{
     static int bench_cludge = 0;

     /* bench_running may be reset while we still have the benchmark
        timer active, leading to SIGALRM. Only seen with !OS_TIMER. */
     bench_cludge |= bench_running;

     if (!bench_cludge) {
#if !OS_TIMER
         sig_timer_emu_tick();
#endif
         if (event_pending) {
...

- bench.c
static void bench_handle_timer(int signum)
{
     bench_running = 0;
#ifndef SA_RESTART
     signal(SIGALRM, bench_handle_timer);
#endif
}

Em 11-01-2013 22:16, magnum escreveu:
> On 12 Jan, 2013, at 0:57 , Claudio André<claudioandre.br@...il.com>  wrote:
>> Em 11-01-2013 21:38, magnum escreveu:
>>> Try reverting your hack and apply f8bf37d instead. Still a hack, but a better one (I hope).
>>>
>>> magnum
>> Seems to be ok.
> Please try this one too. If it works, I think it as a better fix.
>
> magnum
>

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.