[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANO7a6yMjrzdjNoiH2_iNCqDJcq52WU8cffh1Qccq6MXT4nHVw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 10:00:10 +0530
From: Dhiru Kholia <dhiru.kholia@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: BLAKE2 (was: New plugin load order magic)
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 09:15:05AM +0530, Dhiru Kholia wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 6:58 AM, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote:
>> > Then, Dhiru included the slow reference implementation of BLAKE2b
>> > instead of the SIMD implementations. I think we should include all SIMD
>> > implementations that are available from BLAKE2 team, plus the reference
>> > implementations for non-x86 and for older x86 CPUs.
>
>> Speed is not that bad on 64-bit machines.
>
> Yes. It's similar to SHA-512's, but it is supposed to be better (with
> SIMD code).
Speed using XOP on FX-8120. There is lot of improvement but I was
expecting more.
$ ../run/john -fo:raw-blake2-512 -t
Benchmarking: BLAKE2 512 [32/64]... DONE
Raw: 3268K c/s real, 3268K c/s virtual
--
Dhiru
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
