[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b5666d7207018c25ced39df2bfb426c4@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 00:44:34 +0100
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: dynamic format bug (was: A few questions regarding the newly added BLAKE2 format)
On 2 Jan, 2013, at 0:23 , magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> wrote:
> On 1 Jan, 2013, at 23:53 , magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> wrote:
>> We still need a better valid() for dynamic_19 but that is a separate problem.
>
> This too is now fixed (generically, not just for dynamic_19). Still passes Test Suite so it should be OK. Jim, please review patches b8ae4d3 and cb8000d. And you may want to review why some thin self-tests fail with DynamicAlwaysUseRawHashes=Y.
Never mind, I fixed that one too. Trivial, I just reset m_allow_rawhash_fixup if dynamic_THIN_FORMAT_LINK() is called. Should be foolproof (and passes Test Suite with or without DynamicAlwaysUseRawHashes now).
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
