[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b7730aca3f19b51ce64f13b6104cca41@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 21:44:11 +0100
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: New self-test for maximum length
On 30 Dec, 2012, at 18:11 , Dhiru Kholia <dhiru.kholia@...il.com> wrote:
> On Sunday 30 December 2012 10:26 PM, magnum wrote:
>> On 30 Dec, 2012, at 3:49 , magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> wrote:
>>> Unfortunately things get worse if you build with OMP. The test is more effective with more than one keys per crypt(). Not that I have seen any more of your formats yet, it segfaults on IPB so the rest are not tested with a --test=0 run.
>>>
>>> We may have a lot to do. I'll keep focusing on OpenCL formats for now.
>> Benchmarking: Clipperz SRP SHA256 [32/64 oSSL-exp]... (8xOMP) FAILED (get_hash[0](6))
>>
>
> I will look into this one tomorrow.
I had a look at it but saw nothing. It's intermittent, works once out of about four with OMP build, but no problems seen with non-OMP. Very trivial code, I really can't see what could be wrong with it.
Apart from that one, the dynamics are the only ones left that I know of (and I just heard from Jim, he's on it!). We've nailed quite a few bugs the last couple of days 8^)
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
