[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d11b9142f7e7d5d9fc3b04cdbc7b9e00@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 17:56:05 +0100
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: New self-test for maximum length
On 30 Dec, 2012, at 3:49 , magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> wrote:
> Unfortunately things get worse if you build with OMP. The test is more effective with more than one keys per crypt(). Not that I have seen any more of your formats yet, it segfaults on IPB so the rest are not tested with a --test=0 run.
>
> We may have a lot to do. I'll keep focusing on OpenCL formats for now.
Most OpenCL formats are OK now. And many others (no segfaults now). Here's what I get now, 64-bit CPU-only OMP build:
Benchmarking: dynamic_1011 md5($p.md5($s)) (WebEdition CMS) [128/128 SSE2 intrinsics 10x4x3]... FAILED (get_hash[0](9))
Benchmarking: dynamic_1012 md5($p.md5($s)) (WebEdition CMS) [128/128 SSE2 intrinsics 10x4x3]... FAILED (get_hash[0](9))
Benchmarking: dynamic_1013 md5($p.PMD5(username)) (WebEdition CMS) [128/128 SSE2 intrinsics 10x4x3]... FAILED (get_hash[0](9))
Benchmarking: Lotus Notes/Domino 6 More Secure Internet Password [8/64]... FAILED (max. length in index 0: wrote 64, got 63 back)
Benchmarking: EPiServer SID salted SHA-1 [32/64]... FAILED (max. length in index 0: wrote 124, got 123 back)
Benchmarking: Kerberos v4 TGT DES [32/64]... FAILED (max. length in index 0: wrote 32, got 31 back)
Benchmarking: Clipperz SRP SHA256 [32/64 oSSL-exp]... (8xOMP) FAILED (get_hash[0](6))
Benchmarking: Oracle 11g SHA-1 [128/128 SSE2 intrinsics 4x]... FAILED (get_hash[0](0))
Benchmarking: PKZIP [32/64]... (8xOMP) FAILED (max. length in index 0: wrote 31, got 30 back)
9 out of 198 tests have FAILED
We may find a few more using Valgrind or that clang thing.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
