[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b30354608fe3aeb62f018cda8010a015@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 01:12:44 +0100
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: John not "showing" cracked passwords in pot file
On 15 Dec, 2012, at 5:05 , Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:01:24AM +0100, magnum wrote:
>> $ echo 5d41402abc4b2a76b9719d911017c592:hello >test.pot
> [...]
>> * split() adds a tag
>
> IIRC, in that case only tagged strings will be matched in the pot file.
>
> To match non-tagged strings (verbatim), omit the --format option.
>
> There was never an intent to support going from non-tagging split() to
> tagging split() for any format, yet supporting old pot records.
What if we added tags in prepare() instead of split()? That would change things but I'm not sure it would do the trick. We should have these things written down somewhere.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
