[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a33a203a7f2bd0456b5a332a65c38d46@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2012 22:33:08 +0100
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: new warnings when compiling unstable-jumbo
On 2 Dec, 2012, at 17:53 , Dhiru Kholia <dhiru.kholia@...il.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 9:51 PM, magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> wrote:
>> On 26 Nov, 2012, at 5:39 , Dhiru Kholia <dhiru.kholia@...il.com> wrote:
>>> I am seeing new warnings like,
>>>
>>> options.c:133: warning: integer constant is too large for ‘long’ type
>>> options.c:133: warning: integer constant is too large for ‘long’ type
>>>
>>> ✗ gcc --version
>>> gcc (Ubuntu 4.4.3-4ubuntu5.1) 4.4.3
>>>
>>> ✗ uname -a
>>> Linux bt 3.2.6 #1 SMP Fri Feb 17 10:40:05 EST 2012 i686 GNU/Linux
>>
>> I can't see why. Try checking sizeof(ARCH_WORD_64) for a start.
>
> I switched to GCC 4.7.2 and no longer get these warnings.
It is still something that might need a fix. I get the warnings when building 32-bit OSX. I can't see why - opt_flags is typedefed to ARCH_WORD_64 and that one is in turn typedefed to unsigned long long on this system.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
