[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANO7a6wnuts-TiO8D+0PcARCtp3J7UREGfx+5U0T2DBzzVvo0A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 00:35:04 +0530
From: Dhiru Kholia <dhiru.kholia@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Static analysis of John using Coverity
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Robert B. Harris <rs904c@...scape.net> wrote:
> Is anyone on list interested and have the time for this?
Count me in. I am waiting to find out how well Coverity works.
> There are other analyzers as well... Coverity is supposed to have a low
> false positive rate, so I think that might be a good program to start with
I have started trying "Clang Static Analyzer" against magnum-jumbo. To
use it do the following steps,
0. Install "Clang Static Analyzer"
1. Apply attached patch to Makefile. Do "make clean"
2. Run "scan-build make linux-x86-64-clang-debug"
3. Finally run, "scan-view /tmp/XXXX" to view the bugs.
The output looks great. I am in process of fixing the bugs it has found.
Some screenshots,
1. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1522424/ca/ca-wbb3.png
2. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1522424/ca/clang-analyzer.png
3. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1522424/ca/wa-sapG.png
--
Cheers,
Dhiru
Download attachment "clang-analyzer.diff" of type "application/octet-stream" (1037 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
