[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <060952825932a2313f9faaf60eb9c233@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 17:53:31 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Benchmark format error
On 31 Aug, 2012, at 12:43 , Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 12:28:05PM +0200, Camille Mougey wrote:
>> I had misunderstood the relations
>> between get_hash* and cmp_*. Actually, the default format function fix the
>> problem :).
>
> Do you mean fmt_default_binary_hash and fmt_default_get_hash? If so,
> their use kills performance at many hashes per salt. It also slows down
> the loader, even with few hashes per salt as long as the total number
> of hashes is large. The loader will then print nasty warnings about
> "excessive partial hash collisions" and explain the cause (lacking
> "proper binary_hash() function definitions"). So what you did probably
> counts as a temporary workaround, not a fix. Just test it with a
> million hashes and see what happens.
Despite that, don't hesitate to post your format. We can help you sort it out if needed.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
