[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120820054849.GA2970@openwall.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 09:48:49 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Aleksey's daily status report #13
Aleksey, Frank -
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 09:42:02AM +0400, Solar Designer wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 03:14:51AM +0400, Aleksey Cherepanov wrote:
> > - .debs are finished
> > - .rpms are finished
> > Ugh... %-)
>
> This would be good if it were true, but from what you wrote below you're
> merely repackaging previously built binaries. Frank - did you approve
> this sort of thing (and I missed it)?
>
> Do the resulting packages have proper dependencies on the libraries?
Well, I guess they do, since the way at least RPM handles this does not
in any way depend on the actual build from source being done. I'm not
familiar with building .deb's and I haven't seen how you do it, though.
So my question above applies to the .deb's only - for the .rpm's I know
the answer.
Anyhow, not building from source during package build feels wrong to me.
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
