[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <16cd3fc.20bd.1392ce3a594.Webtop.0@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 20:44:39 -0400 (EDT)
From: jfoug@....net
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: SRP
> On 2012-08-15 19:20, jfoug wrote:
>> I have fixed the warnings, and added OMP. The change has been pushed
>> to jumbo-bleeding (9c0169a).
>
> You should have pushed it to magnum-jumbo. Now I had to cherry-pick
> the
> fixes "backwards" to magnum-jumbo and could not avoid it being merged
> back as a dupe no-op commit to bleeding, confusing history. No
> problem,
> just consider this for future patches.
Sorry, I thought it was only pushed to bleeding. Also, that format has
format version #defines in it, so it 'should' be safe to have exact same
file in mag-jumbo as in mag-bleeding.
I will have to look to see what the problem is. I may have not properly
done an #if 1 or something. I have some code in there, that I am pretty
sure will ONLY work on LE 32 bit systems. It was really only a test, to
try to squeeze more out of GMP, by avoiding setter and getter code. But
it did not impact speed, a great deal.
Jim.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
