[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+TsHUCC1EvhG0P-2KuVpHQ5ijCYiW5uXeT7de6W8Kq3CRq3oQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 21:55:01 +0530
From: Sayantan Datta <std2048@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: bf-opencl fails self-test on CPU
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 6:04 PM, magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> wrote:
> On 2012-08-11 09:42, Sayantan Datta wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
> wrote:
> >> Any idea why bf-opencl fails self-test on CPU (with AMD's SDK)? Will it
> >> succeed with some other settings in opencl_bf_std.h maybe?
> >
> > I guess it is due to the lack of LDS on CPU. I'm not sure though but
> I'll
> > find out. Also is it necessary to run the bf-opencl on CPU? We might
> need a
> > little modified kernel for that.
>
> FWIW it works fine on my laptop, using Intel's SDK.
>
> magnum@...ge:~/src/john/src [1.7.9-jumbo-6-fixes]$ ../run/john -t
> -fo:bf-opencl
> OpenCL platform 0: Intel(R) OpenCL, 1 device(s).
> Using device 0: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU P8600 @ 2.40GHz
> ****Please see 'opencl_bf_std.h' for device specific optimizations****
> Benchmarking: OpenBSD Blowfish (x32) [OpenCL]... DONE
> Raw: 595 c/s real, 315 c/s virtual
>
> magnum
>
It fails on i5 2500k using AMD's SDK. So I would like to install the intel
SDK alongside the AMD APP. Would that be a problem ?
Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
