[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cfe27921ac188e5265e0683a5e381392@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 13:00:24 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: pwsafe-gpu (was: Re: Current -fixes GPU formats vs TS)
On 2012-08-11 02:38, Solar Designer wrote:
> Lukas -
>
> As discussed on IRC, here are my changes to pwsafe-cuda. The most
> important one is initialization of w[14]. This makes the problem go
> away for me. Please implement similar changes to pwsafe-opencl.
>
> magnum - we need to get both sets of changes into the -fixes branch,
> even though my patch happens to be against magnum-jumbo.
Aye. This fixes all problems, though I will wait for Lukas patch before
committing. Same changes to pwsafe-opencl give a 40% boost on GTX570!
Though it's still a lot slower than the CUDA format despite being
identical code - I figure that's mostly caused by inoptimal LWS/GWS figures.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
