[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e1cc2f939f0c2049eac02b0c307502c9@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 22:22:47 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: mscash2: CPU and GPU formats disagree about canonical
hash representation (and use different test vectors)
On 2012-08-02 22:18, Frank Dittrich wrote:
> To be more specific, it is not just that the canonical hash
> representations differ, it is even worse.
>
> The CPU format implementations doesn't recognize hashes written into the
> pot file by GPU format implementations as valid, and vice versa.
> (Of course, GPU format implementations cannot treat hashes with an
> unsupported iteration count (i.e., != 10240) as valid.)
>
> This is unfortunate, because hashes cracked by one implementation are
> still counted as uncracked when loading the same hash file for cracking
> with another implementation.
This a bug. This must be fixed, preferably in the GPU formats (IMHO).
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
