[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <500DB541.1000205@mccme.ru>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 00:34:09 +0400
From: Alexander Cherepanov <cherepan@...me.ru>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Fwd: [john-contest] Building linux-x86-64-clang fails
On 2012-07-23 14:45, Frank Dittrich wrote:
> On 07/23/2012 11:46 AM, Alexander Cherepanov wrote:
>> Running
>>
>> make clean linux-x86-64-clang
>>
>> on my 64bit Debian Stable fails on the following command:
>>
>> clang -Wall -c -O2 -I/usr/include -msse2 -DHAVE_CRYPT -DHAVE_DL
>> -funroll-loops compiler.c
>>
>> Running this command with an additional option -v gives an attached output.
>
> Wow: clang version 1.1 (Debian 2.7-3)
> Is that the stable version, or the stale version?
Debian Stable, fully updated.
> What is the output of
>
> clang -dumpversion
$ clang -dumpversion
1.1
> clang 2.9 and clang 3.0 both show
> 4.2.1
>
> (claiming to be compatible with gcc 4.2.1)
>
> On fedora 16 (32bit and 64bit), clang 2.9, the build succeeds, as well
> as for fedora 17 with clang 3.0.
Well, on Debian Unstable it also succeeds.
--
Alexander Cherepanov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
