[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP166CE5A026E9440C183DE9EFDDD0@phx.gbl>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 19:51:12 +0200
From: Frank Dittrich <frank_dittrich@...mail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: RFC: add more information to --list=build-info output?
On 07/20/2012 08:52 AM, Frank Dittrich wrote:
> This is now the last line of --list=build-info output (after printing
> compiler information):
> OpenSSL library version: 10000003
> If the version of the OpenSSL library loaded at run time differs from
> the compile time version, the line looks similar to this one:
> OpenSSL library version: 10000003 (loaded: 10000003)
> (except that both numbers would differ, of course).
Now that this patch is committed to magnum's repository, can someone
using Windows please test and report what happens if you use
--list=build-info with the OpenSSL library removed?
What is the exact output?
There should be a line "OpenSSL library version: 10000003" or similar
(other version number), even if an error occurs when john tries to
detect the run-time version of the library.
Frank
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
