Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANO7a6z1KUO=-HA_L7oXiTbpdkJzV7DHWJFCHA4HnWpJoJ=dVA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 22:13:49 +0530
From: Dhiru Kholia <dhiru.kholia@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: OpenCL Keychain, where is the bug?

On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Dhiru Kholia <dhiru.kholia@...il.com> wrote:
> The CPU keychain format cracks attached keychain-hashes files quickly.
> However my OpenCL implementation (patch against magnum-jumbo attached)
> doesn't crack the hashes. It passes self-tests, seems to work but
> doesn't actually crack the hashes.
>
> cracked[index] is getting set correctly AFAIK. Any ideas where the the
> bug is? Thanks!

Found it:

-#define SALT_SIZE              20
+#define SALT_SIZE              sizeof(*salt_struct)

I mixed up SALTEN and SALT_SIZE.

-- 
Cheers,
Dhiru

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.