|
Message-ID: <CANO7a6xoJE4neJtKDYJhg6tnk-xfibnTpj9yLVRqMsqER2K3AQ@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 16:14:12 +0530 From: Dhiru Kholia <dhiru.kholia@...il.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Re: [magnum-jumbo] pfx cracking: 8k+ P12/PFX error (#67) On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 03:59:23PM +0530, Dhiru Kholia wrote: >> Another relevant question : reading the actual file from john will be >> a bad hack, correct? > > Do you mean embedding the filename in whatever *2john outputs? If so, > this is appropriate for large files. I think we're doing it for RAR > already. Yes, I meant this. I will add a flag to pfx2john's output indicating whether the file's contents are included in the hash or not. > Or do you mean patching the loader to read binary files directly? This > is inconsistent with the current approach, although we might arrive at > it later, perhaps by introducing some per-format handler similar to > prepare() but intended for binary input files. This is not something > you should attempt now. I stay away from the loader. Not too many good memories of it ;) -- Cheers, Dhiru
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.