|
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP45812A451CB90B37113F28DFDDB0@phx.gbl> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 10:28:36 +0200 From: Frank Dittrich <frank_dittrich@...mail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: problem with disc space for shared files in MJohn On 07/15/2012 01:24 PM, Aleksey Cherepanov wrote: > I heard that some users have about 40gb of wordlists individually. > Currently it would be a problem if MJohn would copy all files to the > server. We might even need some precautions against using dictionaries that differ only in the sequence of words. Imagine someone got rockyou.txt in the original sequence (sorted by descending frequency), and someone else sorted the file alphabetically. (There might even be different sort sequences, depending on locale settings.) It is obvious that running the same kind of attacks using both of these files is pointless. We can't just treat both versions of the file as the same file. Otherwise, and interrupted session cannot be restored on another client. Furthermore, the file sorted by frequency usually is the preferred one. (Just in case later on we just want to try more complex rules on the top 1000 passwords of this wordlist...) Similar issues could exist with two files that only differ in line endings (<LF> vs. <CR><LF>). Even files which just use different encodings should be taken care of, if the majority of words contain just ASCII characters, and only very few contain non-ASCII characters. Do we need to implement some checks for newly added files, and issue a warning whenever a new file is added which has the same size and/or same number of lines as an already existing file? (OTOH, the same problem can exist with rule sections only differing in the sequence of rules, or rules sections with many overlapping rules.) Frank
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.