|
Message-ID: <20120710055647.GA2222@debian> Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 09:56:47 +0400 From: Aleksey Cherepanov <aleksey.4erepanov@...il.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Re: Aleksey's status report #10 On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 11:57:53AM +0200, Frank Dittrich wrote: > On 06/27/2012 02:55 PM, Frank Dittrich wrote: > > For other section names, you might even need to implement new > > functionality to john, like listing the contents of a section (with > > include statements for sections or file names being resolved). > > Or at least functionality to get the value of a certain variable from a > > config section, so that you can parse > > > > File = $JOHN/my.chr > > > > and know which file is needed for that attack. > > It gets even more complicated, because default for --incremental is All, > except when you are cracking LM DES hashes. > For lm, the default is LanMan -> lanman.chr > (But we can also just assume that lanman.chr exists on all the clients. If we assume that .chr file(s) exists on all clients than we should check that it is the original file. >From my point of view as a user it seems natural to replace original file with newly generated and probably adjust config a bit instead of adding a new section. Regards, Aleksey Cherepanov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.