Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120708091107.GA29660@openwall.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 13:11:07 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Between 1.7.9-jumbo-3 and 1.7.9-jumbo-4 performance of --format=bf dropped by more than 20%

Frank -

On your Atom, can you try setting BF_ASM 1, BF_X2 0 (the combination
that you previously determined to be fastest, right?), but also patch
this line in x86.S:

	movl $BF_body_generic,BF_body

to read:

	movl $BF_body_P1,BF_body

That is, use the original Pentium's asm code for Blowfish.

Per your results for MD5, chances are that this will result in even
faster Blowfish speed than what you had observed before.  If so, we'll
need to add Atom detection to x86.S.

Thanks,

Alexander

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.