[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120708083614.GA29336@openwall.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 12:36:14 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Rotate and bitselect investigation
On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 12:34:51PM +0530, Sayantan Datta wrote:
> There was a small typo in the optimized kernel. Apparently you didn't
> change from manual to bitselect in the SHA1_digest() function which is
> called in the 10K iteration.
Oh, indeed. Good catch.
> Here's the new results with 1/4 of the KPC you used in the previous
> benchmark.
...
> Using device 0: GeForce GTX 570
...
> Benchmarking: M$ Cache Hash 2 (DCC2) PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA-1 [OpenCL]... DONE
> Raw: 30481 c/s real, 30481 c/s virtual
That's a 4% slowdown - is this solely because of the reduced KPC?
> Using device 0: Tahiti
...
> Benchmarking: M$ Cache Hash 2 (DCC2) PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA-1 [OpenCL]... DONE
> Raw: 99801 c/s real, 99296 c/s virtual
That's a 2% speedup, presumably due to bitselect(). I wonder what the
speedup would be with the same KPC as before.
Thanks,
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
