[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP776C3AD7E14EA008E4440AFDEE0@phx.gbl>
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 00:04:15 +0200
From: Frank Dittrich <frank_dittrich@...mail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Between 1.7.9-jumbo-3 and 1.7.9-jumbo-4 performance of --format=bf
dropped by more than 20%
... and stayed at this level.
Not that 32bit Linux is that important, but on my atom netbook (fedora
16, gcc 4.6.3) i got:
$ ./john-1.7.9-jumbo-3-sse2 --test=10 --format=bf
Benchmarking: OpenBSD Blowfish (x32) [32/32]... DONE
Raw: 216 c/s real, 217 c/s virtual
$ ./john-1.7.9-jumbo-4-sse2 --test=10 --format=bf
Benchmarking: OpenBSD Blowfish (x32) [32/32 X2]... DONE
Raw: 167 c/s real, 167 c/s virtual
and latest git:
$ ./john --test=10 --format=bf
Benchmarking: OpenBSD Blowfish (x32) [32/32 X2]... DONE
Raw: 169 c/s real, 169 c/s virtual
And sse2i with latest git:
$ ./john --test=10 --format=bf
Benchmarking: OpenBSD Blowfish (x32) [32/32 X2]... DONE
Raw: 169 c/s real, 169 c/s virtual
Unfortunately, on github there is no commit between jumbo-3 and jumbo-4,
so I cannot bisect to find out what caused this drop in performance.
(I tested the 64bit Linux build as well, it is not affected.)
Frank
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
