Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c20f7a8722337c19a733b2a603936019@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 19:43:08 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: common find_best_workgroup()

On 2012-07-05 16:50, Claudio André wrote:
> Em 05-07-2012 11:23, magnum escreveu:
>> I have already committed an experimental fix. Seems to work fine but
>> still testing (I also changed all formats except Claudio's so they use
>> the shared function) 
> I can change mine too. I need only two "new" things inside the default
> find_best stuff.
> 
> I will comment on one of your commits, just have to  check if it makes
> sense on AMD first.

BTW it's very inconsistent that Intel recommends using LWS=8 for CPU in
all documentation, but instead of return 8 for
CL_KERNEL_WORK_GROUP_SIZE, they return 1024.  WAT!

magnum

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.