[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3f071e3a9001663c63698fca520dc3bd@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 02:54:47 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Building bleeding (target linux-x86-clang) fails (gost.h/gost_plug.c)
You did not. And Frank's patch was not really in complete patch format
so I need a patch from either one of you :)
magnum
On 2012-07-03 19:57, jfoug wrote:
> Did I not send the patch??
>
>> From: Frank Dittrich [mailto:frank_dittrich@...mail.com]
>>>
>>> Can you try this patch (against bleeding).
>>
>> Which patch
>>
>>> It changes the name from
>>> __bswap_32() to _Swap_32() before the #define.
>>
>> May be we should be even more paranoid, and define _JtR_Swap_32()?
>
> That likely would be even better (smarter). The #define still keeps the
> real code, looking nice, and using the normal item. But we can add prefix
> warts, so that the real functions would never conflict with anything.
>
> Jim.
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
