[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dbec603fd7c63c3af7e7ae68e7bcfdd5@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 23:44:08 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: New -list function added to bleeding. -list=format-methods
Committed now.
magnum
On 2012-07-02 23:30, jfoug wrote:
> Here is the fixed patch (patches against magnum-bleeding)
>
>> From: Frank Dittrich [mailto:frank_dittrich@...mail.com]
>> Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 3:15 PM
>> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
>> Subject: Re: [john-dev] New -list function added to bleeding. -
>> list=format-methods
>>
>> On 07/02/2012 07:31 PM, jfoug wrote:
>>> The syntax is --list=format-methds[=WHICH]
>>
>> s/methds/methods/
>> But the patch itself is correct.
>
> Yes, this was typed in by hand, and wrong ;) The format, and dox are
> correct.
>
> Changes in this version:
>
>
> --list=format-methods[=which] changed to --list=format-methods[:WHICH] in
> dox, in runtime, and the [:WHICH] added to -list=? Printout.
>
> An invalid WHICH will print to stderr a message, and exit(1).
>
> I believe this should be ready.
>
> As for the listing of no test vector, this is a method test, not data test.
> The normal -list=format[-all]-details should give # of test vectors.
>
> Jim.
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
