[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <00e501cd5899$d77d8320$86788960$@net>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 16:30:02 -0500
From: "jfoug" <jfoug@....net>
To: <john-dev@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: RE: New -list function added to bleeding. -list=format-methods
Here is the fixed patch (patches against magnum-bleeding)
>From: Frank Dittrich [mailto:frank_dittrich@...mail.com]
>Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 3:15 PM
>To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
>Subject: Re: [john-dev] New -list function added to bleeding. -
>list=format-methods
>
>On 07/02/2012 07:31 PM, jfoug wrote:
>> The syntax is --list=format-methds[=WHICH]
>
>s/methds/methods/
>But the patch itself is correct.
Yes, this was typed in by hand, and wrong ;) The format, and dox are
correct.
Changes in this version:
--list=format-methods[=which] changed to --list=format-methods[:WHICH] in
dox, in runtime, and the [:WHICH] added to -list=? Printout.
An invalid WHICH will print to stderr a message, and exit(1).
I believe this should be ready.
As for the listing of no test vector, this is a method test, not data test.
The normal -list=format[-all]-details should give # of test vectors.
Jim.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
