[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP3096F4E1DDD9D8A21C34786FDEA0@phx.gbl>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 22:23:19 +0200
From: Frank Dittrich <frank_dittrich@...mail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Adjust LDFLAGS for clang targets
On 06/29/2012 10:15 PM, magnum wrote:
> On 2012-06-29 22:06, magnum wrote:
>> On 2012-06-29 17:58, Frank Dittrich wrote:
>>> For non-debug targets reuse the default LDFLAGS, to make sure -s is
>>> added and libraries under /usr/local/lib and /usr/local/ssl/lib are
>>> preferred (like with other Linux targets)
>>
>> Give me a pull request :)
>
> Just kidding, committed now
Thanks. Turns out that was not just a cosmetic change.
Without the -lz added to LDFLAGS, the linux-x86-64-clang build would fail.
Frank
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
