[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120701151506.SHHXZ.329859.imail@eastrmwml207>
Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2012 15:15:06 -0400
From: <jfoug@....net>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: raw-sha1-ng reduced binary size
---- magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> wrote:
>
> That bug in the bleeding branch is fixed now (it did not affect
> Jumbo-6). The memory footprint remains at 674 MB but the speed was even
> better,
Extra throughput is always good ;) The get_source() (likely soon to be called source) is something that should be high on the list. It does seem to improve performance (much more than I expected), on the HW I have been working with. And it certainly reduces memory footprint a lot, when working with a lot of hashes.
> 15 seconds. So from these tests I suppose what we should really
> do is write a get_source() for your format in the bleeding branch,
> instead of reducing binary size. They are obviously mutually exclusive -
> you can't reconstruct the ciphertext source from a reduced binary.
>
> magnum
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
