Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7b05d71f0046394c6c8a495f696f9665@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 02:03:53 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Shouldn't the TS work with a pw.dic in reversed order
 as well?

On 2012-06-29 01:59, Frank Dittrich wrote:
> I almost suspected a clang compiler bug and was about to compile with
> -O0, but linux-x86-mmx:
> 
> $ ./jtrts.pl -q
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> - JtR-TestSuite (jtrts). Version 1.12.4, June 22, 2012.  By, Jim
> Fougeron & others
> - Testing:  John the Ripper password cracker, ver: 1.7.9-jumbo-6-RC0
> [linux-x86-mmx]
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> form=dynamic_2                    guesses: 1496 time: 0:00:00:00 :
> Expected count(s) (1500)  [!!!FAILED!!!]
> form=dynamic_2-raw                guesses: 1496 time: 0:00:00:00 :
> Expected count(s) (1500)  [!!!FAILED!!!]
> form=dynamic_3                    guesses: 1496 time: 0:00:00:00 :
> Expected count(s) (1500)  [!!!FAILED!!!]
> form=dynamic_3-raw                guesses: 1496 time: 0:00:00:00 :
> Expected count(s) (1500)  [!!!FAILED!!!]
> form=dynamic_34                   guesses: 1496 time: 0:00:00:00 :
> Expected count(s) (1500)  [!!!FAILED!!!]

Did you ever try linux-x86-mmx without reversed dictionaries? Maybe they
get these figures anyway?

magnum

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.