|
Message-ID: <7b05d71f0046394c6c8a495f696f9665@smtp.hushmail.com> Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 02:03:53 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Shouldn't the TS work with a pw.dic in reversed order as well? On 2012-06-29 01:59, Frank Dittrich wrote: > I almost suspected a clang compiler bug and was about to compile with > -O0, but linux-x86-mmx: > > $ ./jtrts.pl -q > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > - JtR-TestSuite (jtrts). Version 1.12.4, June 22, 2012. By, Jim > Fougeron & others > - Testing: John the Ripper password cracker, ver: 1.7.9-jumbo-6-RC0 > [linux-x86-mmx] > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > form=dynamic_2 guesses: 1496 time: 0:00:00:00 : > Expected count(s) (1500) [!!!FAILED!!!] > form=dynamic_2-raw guesses: 1496 time: 0:00:00:00 : > Expected count(s) (1500) [!!!FAILED!!!] > form=dynamic_3 guesses: 1496 time: 0:00:00:00 : > Expected count(s) (1500) [!!!FAILED!!!] > form=dynamic_3-raw guesses: 1496 time: 0:00:00:00 : > Expected count(s) (1500) [!!!FAILED!!!] > form=dynamic_34 guesses: 1496 time: 0:00:00:00 : > Expected count(s) (1500) [!!!FAILED!!!] Did you ever try linux-x86-mmx without reversed dictionaries? Maybe they get these figures anyway? magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.