|
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP3052119A448DF8DD21EC07FFDE60@phx.gbl> Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 01:14:51 +0200 From: Frank Dittrich <frank_dittrich@...mail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Shouldn't the TS work with a pw.dic in reversed order as well? On 06/29/2012 12:40 AM, Frank Dittrich wrote: > On 06/29/2012 12:28 AM, Frank Dittrich wrote: >> Will repeat the test after make clean..., and with other .dic files >> reversed as well. > > This didn't produce any errors so far for linux-x86-sse2. > Unfortunately, I deleted the old binary and closed that terminal. > > Now I have to repeat the test with all the build targets (OMP/non-OMP) > on my slow 32bit netbook. I knew the self test was fast and I definitely didn't spend more than one minute on it, so I knew this wasn't an OMP build. With non-OMP linux-x86-clang, I can reproduce the errors. All dictionary files are with reversed order of candidatepasswords, compared to the official TS. $ ./jtrts.pl -q ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - JtR-TestSuite (jtrts). Version 1.12.4, June 22, 2012. By, Jim Fougeron & others - Testing: John the Ripper password cracker, ver: 1.7.9-jumbo-6-RC0 [linux-x86-clang] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- form=dynamic_2 guesses: 1482 time: 0:00:00:00 : Expected count(s) (1500) [!!!FAILED!!!] form=dynamic_2-raw guesses: 1482 time: 0:00:00:00 : Expected count(s) (1500) [!!!FAILED!!!] form=dynamic_3 guesses: 1482 time: 0:00:00:00 : Expected count(s) (1500) [!!!FAILED!!!] form=dynamic_3-raw guesses: 1482 time: 0:00:00:00 : Expected count(s) (1500) [!!!FAILED!!!] form=dynamic_34 guesses: 1482 time: 0:00:00:00 : Expected count(s) (1500) [!!!FAILED!!!] .pot CHK:hmac-sha256 guesses: 1500 time: 0:00:00:08 [PASSED] (Still running.)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.