[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <96fcc0b9c54612ab7b658cd4377396cc@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 22:27:30 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: formats failing on big-endian
On 2012-06-28 22:17, Solar Designer wrote:
> magnum, all -
>
> After my WPA-PSK fix, we have the following:
>
> Benchmarking: MS SQL 2005 SHA-1 [32/32]... FAILED (get_hash[0](0))
> Benchmarking: Office 2007/2010 SHA-1/AES [32/32]... FAILED (cmp_all(1))
> Benchmarking: RAR3 SHA-1 AES (4 characters) [32/32]... FAILED (cmp_all(1))
> 3 out of 113 tests have FAILED
>
> This is with old OpenSSL, so formats requiring OpenSSL 0.9.8+ were not
> even tested here.
>
> I'd appreciate it if someone else tests on a big-endian machine as well.
> (Some or all of the failures above could actually be for a different
> reason.)
I think it was mentioned somewhere: These were the few ones not fixed by
Jim when he did the Sparc. I have no access to any usable host so I
can't do much (the RAR format includes big-endian stuff from
dry-running). The MSSQL should be easy but again, I have no gear. For
Office, I have no idea. I think we should ignore these and just say they
are broken on BE for now.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
