[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120626014754.GA11675@openwall.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 05:47:54 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: phpass OpenCL and CUDA
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 03:32:27AM +0200, Lukas Odzioba wrote:
> 2012/6/26 Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>:
> > 1. There's a function called "cuda_md5" - rename it.
> >
> > 2. Make use of rotate() and bitselect().
> I'll send fix for that in a moment. My target is to make vectorized
> code work properly so even if code is dirty it should not stay there
> for long.
Sure. Yet the non-vectorized code is to stay for jumbo-6, right?
> > Are we releasing with these lower speeds?
> Yes, there were no any major changes. Lower speeds are because test
> vector change.
> Previously we're testing just one password, now 15 passwords with
> increasing length.
I think the increasing lengths are only in the CUDA code, right?
Thus, the lower OpenCL speed is solely from the reverted code, right?
Do you happen to know what password lengths the published hashcat speeds
are for?
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
