Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3253f7caddbc67c123a7992517e9b6cc@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:02:21 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Jumbo candidate vs Test Suite

On 2012-06-25 09:58, Lukas Odzioba wrote:
> 2012/6/25 magnum<john.magnum@...hmail.com>:
>> I'm pretty sure we have had vectorized phpass pass TS before. This is not
>> only slower, it also does not work:
>>
>> $ ../run/john -t -fo:phpass-opencl
>> OpenCL platform 0: NVIDIA CUDA, 1 device(s).
>> Using device 0: GeForce GTX 570
>> Compilation log:
>> ptxas info    : Compiling entry function 'phpass' for 'sm_20'
>> ptxas info    : Function properties for phpass
>>   32 bytes stack frame, 0 bytes spill stores, 0 bytes spill loads
>> ptxas info    : Used 35 registers, 44 bytes cmem[0]
>> OpenCL error (CL_OUT_OF_RESOURCES) in file (opencl_phpass_fmt.c) at line
>> (165) - (Run kernel)
>
> This should be easy to fix. I'll try to find first vectorized version on github.
>


I'm currently testing the one from 
e547495089210e413e3534abaa0eeff26c356e88. This is just before your 
non-byte_addressable_store patch

magnum

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.