|
Message-ID: <CANJ2NMP5P80+HJw35NwBjvYGH5vUZ8NYUJRHci3EwDbV2uDczg@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 13:11:44 +0800 From: myrice <qqlddg@...il.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: xsha512-opencl, raw-sha512-opencl on HD 7970 (was: Myrice: Weekly Report #3) On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 5:08 AM, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote: > myrice - > > This is a reminder that the problem mentioned below is still present. > Yet raw-sha512-opencl passes self-test fine (but is slow). > $ ./john -te -fo=xsha512-opencl -pla=1 > OpenCL platform 1: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing, 2 device(s). > Using device 0: Tahiti > Compilation log: LOOP UNROLL: pragma unroll (line 163) > Unrolled as requested! > LOOP UNROLL: pragma unroll (line 168) > Unrolled as requested! > LOOP UNROLL: pragma unroll (line 183) > Unrolled as requested! > > Optimal Group work Size = 256 > Global work size = 2097152 > Benchmarking: Mac OS X 10.7+ salted SHA-512 [OpenCL]... FAILED (get_hash[0](0)) > This is strange. I have already fixed it I think. I will test it later. > $ ./john -te -fo=raw-sha512-opencl -pla=1 > OpenCL platform 1: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing, 2 device(s). > Using device 0: Tahiti > Compilation log: LOOP UNROLL: pragma unroll (line 163) > Unrolled as requested! > LOOP UNROLL: pragma unroll (line 168) > Unrolled as requested! > LOOP UNROLL: pragma unroll (line 183) > Unrolled as requested! > > Optimal Group work Size = 128 > Global work size = 524288 > Benchmarking: Raw SHA-512 [OpenCL]... DONE > Raw: 17854K c/s real, 29756K c/s virtual > The speed of raw SAH512-512 is the same with one salt in xsha512-opencl format. The CPU takes too much time. The GPU password generation and async copy you posted just now could improve the performance. I will comment on that now. Thanks myrice
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.