[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP140DE2FE65C51A7EBC920F9FDE20@phx.gbl>
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 22:47:19 +0200
From: Frank Dittrich <frank_dittrich@...mail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Several enhancements for relbench
On 06/24/2012 10:08 PM, Solar Designer wrote:
> This patch, which is now applied, misattributes Frank's changes to
> relbench to me.
But it would also have attributed the bug I introduced to you ;)
> We need to revise these lines:
>
> # John the Ripper benchmark output comparison tool, revision 4
> # Copyright (c) 2011 Solar Designer
>
> adding Frank's copyright and a note that this is not "revision 4" any
> longer. Please do.
OK, done.
Since you didn't suggest a new revision name - is 4.1 OK?
Please apply after
0001-relbench-important-fix-for-duplicate-format-names-in.patch
included in my other mail to john-dev.
Frank
View attachment "0001-relbench-update-copyright-and-change-revision-from-4.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (868 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
