[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120623213712.GA1507@openwall.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 01:37:12 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Some relbench results for linux-x86-sse2 (jumbo5 vs. upcoming jumbo6)
Frank,
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 11:11:09PM +0200, Frank Dittrich wrote:
> And these are the worst regressions:
> $ ./relbench -v j5-sse2-mod.txt j6-sse2.txt|grep "^Ratio:"|cut -f
> 2-|sort -n|head -n 10
...
> 0.61111 real, 0.61111 virtual MediaWiki md5($s.'-'.md5($p)):Many salts
> 0.87012 real, 0.87891 virtual phpass MD5 ($P$9):Raw
...
> 0.88684 real, 0.89589 virtual MySQL:Raw
...
> 0.90846 real, 0.90857 virtual dynamic_27: FreeBSD MD5:Raw
> 0.91026 real, 0.91026 virtual Generic salted MD4:Many salts
> 0.92756 real, 0.92756 virtual dynamic_0: md5($p) (raw-md5):Raw
Can you post the actual output for these (for both versions)?
Are these regressions fully reproducible if you re-run both versions?
What make target did you use? linux-x86-sse2 or linux-x86-sse2i?
Can you try the other and see how it differs?
Thanks,
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
