[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ec519d0f22bbf35e50ecb8eeef466c76@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 00:59:58 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: relbench and changed format names
On 2012-06-22 00:49, Solar Designer wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 12:37:08AM +0200, Frank Dittrich wrote:
>> These are the format names:
>>
>>
>> $ ./john --list=format-details |cut -f 7|sort |uniq -c|grep -v "^ *1 "
>> 2 MySQL
>> 2 NT MD4
>> 2 Raw SHA-1
>>
>> These are the format labels:
>>
>> mysql-fast
>> mysql
>> nt
>> nt2
>> raw-sha1
>> raw-sha1-ng
>
> Thanks. I think we should patch these by moving the " (label
> mysql-fast)" and the like into FORMAT_NAME.
Could we not make relbench look at the world in some different way? I
dislike the idea of using different FORMAT_NAMEs for different
implementations. It kind of screws the idea of ALGORITHM_NAME.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
