|
Message-ID: <c081e9642717cab8b9d36008bf909ea7@smtp.hushmail.com> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 00:49:04 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: relbench and changed format names On 2012-06-22 00:37, Frank Dittrich wrote: > Benchmarking: NT MD4 [128/128 SSE2 + 32/32]... DONE > Raw: 2202K c/s real, 2224K c/s virtual > > Benchmarking: NT MD4 [128/128 SSE2 intrinsics 12x]... DONE > Raw: 5078K c/s real, 5235K c/s virtual How can my vanilla MD4 NT2 format be *that* much faster than Alain's optimised one that reverses rounds? Something must be amiss. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.