[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3d0860be27299c300de092cb45482a33@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 00:08:00 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: relbench and changed format names
On 2012-06-22 00:04, Frank Dittrich wrote:
> On 06/21/2012 04:48 PM, Solar Designer wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 07:33:25AM +0200, Frank Dittrich wrote:
>>> Should I also try relbench, and compare the jumbo-5 results with current
>>> magnum-jumbo?
>>
>> You may, but this will fail to compare many of the formats because of
>> the renames.
>
> Yes, I expected such problems, but I think we need to know the impact of
> the renames.
>
>> Maybe you can correct that by preparing a script that
>> would do similar renames in output of jumbo-5.
>
> For now, I just changed relbench in a way that the jumbo-5 dynamic
> formats are recognized as the same as those in current git.
> This alone increased the number of matching formats by 36.
> See attached patch.
Cool. Should I commit this?
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
