Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP1821AE6D92211BA9B0BABC8FDFD0@phx.gbl>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 20:07:01 +0200
From: Frank Dittrich <frank_dittrich@...mail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Raw SHA-1 and RAR3 SHA-1 AES FAILed self test on 32bit linux OMP
 builds (was: 1.7.9-jumbo-6)

On 06/21/2012 05:53 AM, Solar Designer wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I think we're almost ready to release the current magnum-jumbo as
> 1.7.9-jumbo-6.  If you're aware of anything that needs to happen before
> we make this release, please let me know (post to this thread).

Last time I pulled was some hours ago, so I might not have the latest
fixes, will retry later with current git.

The EPiServer self test FAIL was already known.

I managed to get additional failed tests on OMP enabled builds (but not
for linux-x86-any with OMPFLAGS = -fopenmp, only for
linux-x86-mmx and linux-x86-sse2[i] with OMPFLAGS = -fopenmp -msse2

mmx-omp:

Benchmarking: EPiServer salted SHA-1/SHA-256 [32/32]... (2xOMP) FAILED
(get_hash[1](0))
Benchmarking: Raw SHA-1 [128/128 SSE2 intrinsics 4x]... FAILED
(get_hash[0](0))
2 out of 137 tests have FAILED

sse2-omp

Benchmarking: EPiServer salted SHA-1/SHA-256 [32/32]... (2xOMP) FAILED
(get_hash[1](0))
Benchmarking: Raw SHA-1 [128/128 SSE2 intrinsics 4x]... FAILED
(get_hash[0](0))
Benchmarking: RAR3 SHA-1 AES (4 characters) [32/32]... (2xOMP) FAILED
(cmp_one(3))
3 out of 137 tests have FAILED

sse2i-omp
Benchmarking: EPiServer salted SHA-1/SHA-256 [32/32]... (2xOMP) FAILED
(get_hash[1](0))
Benchmarking: Raw SHA-1 [128/128 SSE2 intrinsics 4x]... FAILED
(get_hash[0](0))
Benchmarking: RAR3 SHA-1 AES (4 characters) [32/32]... (2xOMP) FAILED
(cmp_one(3))
3 out of 137 tests have FAILED

Frank

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.