[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7ee976885e578601c87f037449ef4c3d@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 23:46:22 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Reduced binary size
On 2012-06-18 23:12, jfoug wrote:
>> From: magnum [mailto:john.magnum@...hmail.com]
>> BTW I'm still using the repairing variant of LI format despite its
>> shortcomings. I wonder how much we'd need to hack core to make it behave
>> better.
>
> What exactly were the side effects? If it was that simply the -list was
> failing, then just use -form=dynamic_26, or -form=raw-sha1 on the show
> command line. I really think the rebuild is the correct way to go. The
> hashes are CORRECT in the .pot file. The other way, you end up with
> garbage. They list themselves as dyna_26, but are broken.
You mean -show. Yes, good points. And if you just do --show with no
--format, it will be OK. I'll put that version back in bleeding with
some added comments.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
