[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP2534446DDE32DA55D52AF6AFDF90@phx.gbl>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 21:57:05 +0200
From: Frank Dittrich <frank_dittrich@...mail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [patch] optional new raw sha1 implemetation
On 06/17/2012 06:37 PM, Solar Designer wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 06:14:09PM +0200, Tavis Ormandy wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 07:27:53PM +0400, Solar Designer wrote:
>>> The format label rawsha1_sse4 should probably be renamed because there's
>>> no hard dependency on SSE4.1 anymore.
>>
>> Sure, any suggestions?
>
> raw-sha1-ng (we have raw-sha1 for the old one).
I understand that currently both formats are necessary to continue
experimenting.
But since both formats crack the same hashes, the final goal should be
to have one format, with proper #ifdefs..., or am I missing something?
Frank
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
