[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <29cad652d2308b3c6401763bb5bbc5e2@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 17:38:01 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [patch] optional new raw sha1 implemetation
On 2012-06-17 17:31, Solar Designer wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 07:27:53PM +0400, Solar Designer wrote:
>> There's currently no speedup on XOP:
>>
>> user@...l:~/john/magnum-jumbo-cpu3/src$ ../run/john -te -fo=rawsha1_sse4
>> Benchmarking: Raw SHA-1 [taviso sse4]... DONE
>> Raw: 21591K c/s real, 21591K c/s virtual
>>
>> user@...l:~/john/magnum-jumbo-cpu3/src$ ../run/john -te -fo=raw-sha1
>> Benchmarking: Raw SHA-1 [SSE2i 8x]... DONE
>> Raw: 23513K c/s real, 23751K c/s virtual
>>
>> (This is a linux-x86-64-xop build.) I guess some speedup can be
>> achieved by adding use of XOP intrinsics into your new code - that is,
>> it should become faster than 23.5M c/s then.
>
> BTW, I've just checked that -mxop implies SSE4.1, so the above should
> have used the SSE4.1 trick in Tavis' code.
I built with the -native target so I should have got the same speed as
you for Simon's format. But 22600K is the best I get from the
fluctuations. Any idea why? Is an -xop build different in some way?
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
